w88 sports betting studies involving human subjects require IRB review. Evaluative studies and activities do not. It is not always easy to distinguish between these two types of projects and projects frequently have elements of both. Therefore, the decision about whether IRB review is required should be made in concert with the IRB.
w88 sports betting studies are defined by Federal Regulation as:
Systematic investigation, including w88 sports betting development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
Evaluative studies are defined as:
Systematic collection of w88 sports betting about the activities, characteristics and outcomes of programs to make judgments about the program (or processes, products, systems, organizations, personnel, or policies), improve effectiveness, and/or inform decisions about future program development.
Below are elements that are common to w88 sports betting and evaluation projects. This list is not intended to be comprehensive and not all elements are required in order for a project to be considered w88 sports betting or evaluation. Rather, this list of elements can be used to assist faculty in determining whether an activity involves w88 sports betting requiring IRB review.
Common Elements
Evaluation |
w88 sports betting |
Determines merit, worth, or value
|
Strives to be value-free
|
Assessment of how well a process, product, or program is working
|
Aims to produce new knowledge within a field (designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge)
|
Focus on process, product, or program
|
Focus on population (w88 sports betting subjects)
|
Designed to improve a process, product, or program and w88 sports betting include:
-needs assessment
-process, outcome, or impact evaluation
-cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness analyses
|
Designed to be descriptive, relational, or causal
|
Designed to assess effectiveness of a process, product, or program
|
Designed to be generalized to a population beyond those participating in the w88 sports betting or contribute broadly to knowledge or theory in a field of w88 sports betting (designed to develop or contribute...)
|
Assessment of program or product as it would exist regardless of the evaluation
|
w88 sports betting include an experimental or non-standard intervention
|
Rarely subject to peer w88 sports betting
|
Frequently submitted for peer w88 sports betting
|
Activity will rarely alter the timing or frequency of standard procedures
|
Standard procedures or normal activities w88 sports betting be altered by an experimental intervention
|
Frequently, the entity in which the activity is taking place will also be the funding source; impact or outcome data w88 sports betting be provided to external sponsor to fulfill contractual obligations
|
w88 sports betting have external funding
|
Conducted within a setting of changing actors, priorities, resources, and timelines
|
Controlled setting (interaction or intervention) or natural setting (observation which w88 sports betting or w88 sports betting not include interaction or intervention)
|
Informed by:
Coffman, J. (2003). Ask the Expert: Michael Scriven on the Differences Between Evaluation and Social Science w88 sports betting. The Evaluation Exchange, 9(4). Retrieved December 31, 2013 from The Global Family w88 sports betting Project.