Public w88 casino games laws grant individuals the right to request access to government w88 casino games. But what if a government agency responds to a w88 casino games request by suing the requester?
A Reynolds School of Journalism professor and graduate student recently explored whether such lawsuits could be classified as Strategic Lawsuits Against w88 casino games Participation, known as SLAPP lawsuits. Thirty-one states currently have anti-SLAPP laws, all of which are intended to place limits on frivolous lawsuits against w88 casino games participation. But each state defines "w88 casino games participation" differently.
Reynolds School of Journalism Assistant Professor of Media Law Patrick File.Assistant Professor of Media Law Patrick File and graduate student Leah Wigren's 2019 research examined anti-SLAPP laws to consider whether or not w88 casino games requesters could use anti-SLAPP laws to fight a state's lawsuit against them.
According to File and Wigren's article, "SLAPP suits undermine the constitutional rights of petition and freedom of speech." The research showed a similarity between SLAPP suits and the cases studied. Both intended to stop people from engaging in w88 casino games issues.
"What this may look like is that someone, for instance, seeks w88 casino games from a school district, which is exercising free speech, the district files a SLAPP suit, which can scare a defendant because they might feel they need to hire an attorney and pay a lot of money. If they lose, many states require them to pay the other side's attorney fees.The individual may not answer the SLAPP suit, and then they have defaulted the suitandnot received the w88 casino games they requested," Wigren said.
Reynolds School of Journalism graduate w88 casino games Leah Wigren."The purpose of the lawsuit really isn't to win in arguing that the person's lying or doing undue things to harm [the plaintiff]," File said. "Regardless of the reason the government might have for wanting to withhold the w88 casino games, it's not correct to just sue a w88 casino games requester."
Among the 31 statutes, File and Wigren's research concluded that Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Guam, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island and Texas have laws that will most likely protect a public w88 casino games request as "public participation."
Although the article states that many anti-SLAPP laws may not apply to the lawsuits included in the w88 casino games, Wigren mentioned that the biggest takeaway from the w88 casino games was knowing most states have anti-SLAPP laws in place.
"There is an awareness that governmental or other entities may try to chill speech with SLAPP suits, and states want to prevent that," she said.
Since the research was conducted to assess whether anti-SLAPP laws could be applied to lawsuits against w88 casino games requesters, File said that the next feasible question to research was what states' public w88 casino games laws say about the types of lawsuits they studied.
"It would be a bigger project – since there are more public w88 casino games laws than anti-SLAPP laws, and public w88 casino games laws tend to be more complex – but I think it would help us understand even more about government lawsuits against public w88 casino games requesters."
